<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hans Reiser: Guilty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meaghan</title>
		<link>http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Just because a person's body was never found doesn't mean you can't prove that they're dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a person&#8217;s body was never found doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t prove that they&#8217;re dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su Yuen</title>
		<link>http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Su Yuen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slackerism.com/2008/04/30/hans-reiser-guilty/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Wow! Interesting news! Thanks for highlighting. 

Never expected to see some crime-related news  in Wired, what more one involving a true geek. Guess it goes to show anyone in this world is capable of turning 180 degrees in a split second (if he is indeed guilty). 

And its weird that the juror are basing their decision on his physical expressions / behaviour rather than solid concrete evidence. But I guess that's the best they can do with limited evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Interesting news! Thanks for highlighting. </p>
<p>Never expected to see some crime-related news  in Wired, what more one involving a true geek. Guess it goes to show anyone in this world is capable of turning 180 degrees in a split second (if he is indeed guilty). </p>
<p>And its weird that the juror are basing their decision on his physical expressions / behaviour rather than solid concrete evidence. But I guess that&#8217;s the best they can do with limited evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
